Comments on: Judge Rejects Mercury Insurance’s Lies; Voters Will Be Told of Prop 17 Car Insurance Surcharges

By: seo

seo — Wed, 28 Apr 2010 01:02:53 +0000

Have you ever thought about adding a little bit more than just your thoughts? I mean, what you say is important and everything. But its got no punch, no pop! Maybe if you added a pic or two, a video? You could have such a more powerful blog if you let people SEE what youre talking about instead of just reading it.

By: Carroll B. Merriman

Carroll B. Merriman — Tue, 27 Apr 2010 06:23:46 +0000

You made some Good points there. I did a search on the topic and found most people will agree.

By: Stuart Mandelbaum

Stuart Mandelbaum — Mon, 26 Apr 2010 09:41:05 +0000

Hello can I reference some of the information from this entry if I link back to you?

By: Carmine Sten

Carmine Sten — Mon, 26 Apr 2010 01:49:21 +0000

Amazing, I never knew this, much appreciated.

By: Norine Debruce

Norine Debruce — Sun, 25 Apr 2010 21:25:30 +0000

I really like the post and find that you have explained this in an interesting way. I really had to comment since your post was really interesting, but I was wondering if the new case law that will bring Twitter, Facebook, Myspace into the 21 century is going to happen anytime soon. How will these new technologies fit into our current system and how can they be controlled across cyberspace?

By: needy mother

needy mother — Sat, 24 Apr 2010 22:28:32 +0000

Good point . You are absolutely right.

By: joe thomas

joe thomas — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:18:32 +0000

isnt it the law to have insurance anyway-most people that are uninsured are by choice and not necessity-they still have their cable, big screens and i phones but if they mangle someone with their car they somehow thing it is someone elses problem-its about time-maybe the threat of huge increases will MAKE PEOPLE FOLLOW THE LAW

By: John Hill

John Hill — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 07:38:29 +0000

Vote no on 17.

Many people without current auto insurance are people who have just been cited and the courts and DMV have ordered them to go get insurance. That motorist is going to be an easy mark for an insurance company ripping them off even more than usual. That person has no free choice and calling that person a consumer is idiotic, they have to pay whatever the price is and they will pay that price. Mercury is spending millions to be able to exploit people in this desperate situation and to be legally able to put the screws into people like this.

Is it illegal to let your insurance lapse and drive without insurance?

Sure it is, but the penalties are levied by the courts and the DMV, NOT by private companies. Private companies are not to benefit from lawbreaking, either by themselves, or others.

Vote no on 17.

By: f. seiden

f. seiden — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:54:05 +0000

how did this prop.17 get on the ballot in the first place?

By: Francis Hagan

Francis Hagan — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:54:36 +0000

I don’t trust any insurance company “to do the right thing.”
Mercury’s big lie is only the tip of the iceberg – the insurance-berg!
Don’t be fooled by insurance phonies.